Head Menu
Friday, 13 December. 2019
|
|
|
Top Menu
| Home | Programmes & Projects | Publications | Photo Gallery | Maps | Search |
Main Menu
Dot
 »—ŕ «Š¬š
Dot
MIFTAH - Main Menu
Dot
Biannual Newsletter - Fifth Edition
Fifth Edition
Dot
The Constitution
Introductory Bulletin
The Constitution - Introductory Bulletin
Dot
UN Resolution 1325
UN Resolution 1325
Dot
Dot
 
Date posted: November 24, 2007
By Al-Haq

On 19 November 2007, the UK High Court of Justice denied the claim of Saleh Hasan, filed by Public Interest Lawyers (PIL) in cooperation with Al-Haq, requesting the UK government to clarify its position on its arms-related licensing agreements with Israel. In particular the claim sought to require the UK government to reveal how it satisfies its own criteria that material sold under these agreements is not used in the commission of human rights abuses.

PIL sought a declaration from the High Court that in future dealings with Israel, the UK Government must be transparent about how it has satisfied itself that there is no risk of a breach of the UK Export Control Act of 2002, which incorporates the EU ďconsolidated criteriaĒ governing the export of military equipment. This Act prohibits the UK government from selling arms related products where there is a risk that they will be used for repressive purposes.

Mr. Justice Collins found that while the UK government could provide the information requested, it would involve a ďconsiderable amount of workĒ and that the UK Parliament, through the Quadripartite Committee already exercised a sufficient level of oversight over arms-export licensing, making the claim unnecessary. The Court therefore dismissed the claim.

Following the decision Phil Shiner of Public Interest Lawyers commented:

ďThis result is disappointing. The judge draws comfort from the scrutiny of arms export licensing by the Quadripartite Committee and concludes there is no need for the courts to do so. However, that Committee had been calling for the very same information on transparency that my client has asked for. Further, the amount of extra work involved in providing this information is miniscule by comparison with the importance of the issues at stake. There is a very important test case principle of transparency in decision making by public bodies which we intend to pursue to the Court of Appeal.Ē

Al-Haq fully endorses Mr. Shinerís comments and will continue to work with Public Interest Lawyers in further proceedings.

Source: Al-Haq, 22 November. 2007
Send Article Printer Friendly
Copyright © 2013 MIFTAH
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED