Head Menu
Friday, 13 December. 2019
|
|
|
Top Menu
| Home | Programmes & Projects | Publications | Photo Gallery | Maps | Search |
Main Menu
Dot
ÊÈÑÚ ÇáÂä
Dot
MIFTAH - Main Menu
Dot
Biannual Newsletter - Fifth Edition
Fifth Edition
Dot
The Constitution
Introductory Bulletin
The Constitution - Introductory Bulletin
Dot
UN Resolution 1325
UN Resolution 1325
Dot
Dot
 
Date posted: March 27, 2013
By Ramzy Baroud

US President Barack Obama’s visit to Israel, on March 20, dissipated any persisting illusions. As he walked on the red carpet and warmly embraced top Israeli government and military officials, a new/old reality began to sink in: Obama is no different from his predecessors.

On the day of Obama’s arrival, Israeli rights group B’Tselem, released a disturbing video of Israeli soldiers carrying out a “mass arrest” of nearly 30 Palestinian children on their way to school in the Palestinian city of Hebron.

The children pled and cried to no avail. Their terrified shrieks echoed through the Palestinian neighbourhood as they tried to summon the help of passersby.

“Ammo” [uncle], one begged, “for God sake don’t let them take me”.

Nonetheless, several military vehicles were filled with crying children and their schoolbags.

The video was released on the day Obama was meeting Israeli children at a welcoming ceremony at the home of Israeli President Shimon Peres.

“Their dreams are much the same as [dreams of] children everywhere,” he said.

“In another sense though their lives reflect the difficult reality that Israelis face every single day. They want to be safe, they want to be free from rockets that hit their homes or their schools.”

Many Palestinians immediately pointed out the moral discrepancies in most of Obama’s statements during his stay in Israel. Still, his visit was “historic”, declared numerous headlines in the US and Israeli media.

Aside from the fact that it was his first trip to Israel as a president, it was barely momentous. His unconditional support for Israel was tedious and redundant, predictable even.

Those who have followed his unswerving pro-Israel declarations — including his visit to Israel as a presidential candidate in 2008, his speeches before the Israeli lobby group AIPAC and many other examples — could hardly discern a shift except, perhaps, in the total lack of interest in political sensibility and balance.

He truly delivered in Israel, to the total satisfaction of the Israeli prime minister and his pro-settler government, which was assembled just before Obama’s arrival.

Obama spoke as if entirely unaware of the political shift to the extreme right under way in Israel. Indeed, the new Israeli government is more right wing than any before.

The extremist Jewish Home Party has three important ministries, including Jerusalem and housing, and the ultra-nationalists of Yisrael Beiteinu were awarded the tourism ministry. It means that the next few years will be a settlement-construction bonanza, more ethnic cleansing and greater apartheid.

“It’s good to be back in The Land [Israel],” Obama said in Hebrew, at the Tel Aviv airport.

“The United States is proud to stand with you as your strongest ally and your greatest friend.”

It is believed that for four years, Obama has failed to live up to the nearly impossible expectations of Israel.

Israel requires a president with good oratory skills to, for example, emphasise the “eternal” bond between the US and Israel, and Obama did, signing big cheques and asking few questions. He, of course, did that and more. Aside from the $3.1 billion in financial support, he rerouted hundreds of millions of US money to bankroll Israel’s air defence system, the Iron Dome, whose efficiency is questionable at best.

Obama’s past transgressions, as far as Israel is concerned, is that he dared ask the rightwing Netanyahu government to temporarily freeze settlement construction as a precondition to restarting the stalled, if not dead, peace process.

Of course, there is the widely reported matter of Obama’s lack of fondness for Netanyahu, his antics and renowned arrogance. But that matters little, since Israel’s illegal settlements continued to thrive during Obama’s first term in office.

Expectedly, Netanyahu was gloating. He managed to assemble a government that will cater mostly to extremist Jewish settlers in the West Bank and also masterfully managed to humble the US president, or at least quash his ambition to make his country operate independently in the Middle East, without Israeli consent or interests in mind.

Now that Jewish colonies are flourishing — with occupied East Jerusalem area EI being another major exploit — Netanyahu is once more hoping to start a war on Iran, one that would not be possible without US funding, support and likely direct involvement.

“Thank you for standing by Israel at this time of historic change in the Middle East,” Netanyahu said while standing near the mostly US-funded Iron Dome.

“Thank you for unequivocally affirming Israel’s sovereign right to defend itself, by itself, against any threat.”

Obama did in fact spare a few, although spurious, thoughts for Palestinians.

“Put yourself in their shoes — look at the world through their eyes,” he said to an Israeli audience.

“It is not fair that a Palestinian child cannot grow up in a state of her own, and lives with the presence of a foreign army that controls the movements of her parents every single day.”

One would applaud the seeming moral fortitude if it were not for the pesky matter that the US voted against a Palestinian state at the United Nations last November and tried to intimidate those who did.

And, of course, much of the horror that Palestinian eyes have seen throughout the years was funded and defended by US money and action.

If Obama is trying to resurrect the myth that the US is a well-intentioned bystander or an “honest broker” in some distant conflict, then he has utterly failed. His country is fully embroiled in the conflict, and directly so. Many Palestinian children would still be alive today if the US government had conditioned its massive support for Israel to Tel Aviv’s ending the occupation and ceasing the brutality against the Palestinians.

In a joint press conference in Ramallah, alongside Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, Obama even demanded that Palestinians drop their condition (proposed by Obama himself) of a settlement freeze in order to return to the so-called peace talks.

“That’s not to say settlements aren’t important, that’s to say if we resolve the [main] problems, then settlements will be resolved,” he said.

“If to begin the conversation we have to get everything right from the outset ... then we’re never going to get to the broader issue,” Obama added.

The broader issue, according to the US president is “how do you structure a state of Palestine,” which again, Obama voted against last year, and passionately so.

Aside from resounding rhetoric about peace, Obama is toeing the Israeli line exactly as Netanyahu and the lobby expect him, or any other US president, to do. He has little to offer Palestinians, or Arab nations, but much to expect from them.

Arab states must seek normalised relations with Israel, and Palestinians must “recognise that Israel will be a Jewish state, and that Israelis have the right to insist upon their security”, he lectured in Jerusalem on the second day of his trip, reported by CNN online.

The obvious danger here lies in the fact that Israel oftentimes conflates security and its right to defend itself by arresting children on their way to school in Hebron, or by inflicting or supporting wars against other nations: Lebanon, Iraq and now Iran.

Obama will eventually get back to his Oval Office, ready to resume work as usual. This will include the signing of many papers concerning additional funds, loans, military technology transfers and much more for Israel.

Palestinians, meanwhile, will carry on with their long fight for freedom without his noted oratory skills.

Meanwhile, the families of the 30 children kidnapped by the Israeli army in Hebron will have many days ahead of them in Israeli military court. But that, of course, is a different matter, of no concern to Obama and his many quotable peace slogans.

Read More ...

By: Phoebe Greenwood
Date: 27/05/2013
By: Jillian Kestler-D'Amours
Date: 27/05/2013
By: Sam Bahour
Date: 27/05/2013

By the Same Author

Date: 17/04/2013
Date: 10/04/2013
Date: 27/03/2013
Date: 20/03/2013
Date: 13/03/2013

Source: The Jordan Times
Send Article Printer Friendly
Copyright © 2013 MIFTAH
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED