New Page 1
The plan violates international law. The
Geneva Convention, signed by Israel, says a military occupying power is
prohibited from using the occupied territory unless it benefits the local
population. But since when did Israel care about the many international treaties
it has signed? And why should it? The United States is expected to veto any
international attempt to have Israel retreat from its ongoing destruction of
Palestinian culture and nature. That is how the international system works.
On this occasion it is not about the illegal
settlers, the settlements, or the Annexation Wall, which are all so benevolently
imposed on the local population, who – along with most of the rest of the world
– are still at a loss to realize how all these Israeli uses of occupied
territory benefit it. The latest outrage in the Middle East is an Israeli plan,
already partly implemented, to dump up to 10,000 tons a month of its own garbage
across the 1967 ‘Green Line’ in Occupied Palestinian Territory.
Not only that! The dumping site selected – Abu
Shusha, near Nablus, the largest Palestinian city aside from Jerusalem – was a
Palestinian quarry, which Palestinians will now be unable to use. Moreover, the
dumping site, which is the size of a football stadium, is close to the Mountain
Aquifer, one of the largest sources of freshwater in the whole of Historic
Palestine (including Israel). Any leaks from the 120,000 tons of waste a year
that the Israelis plan to drop there are likely to end up in that water, with
the risk of poisoning it. Palestinians are already critically short of fresh
water, because Israel will not let them use their own water. Israel prohibits
Palestinians from drilling wells. It allows Palestinians only 70 liters of water
per person per day. Israelis, however, get 350 liters. The minimal quantity of
water recommended by the World Health Organization is 100 liters. When supplies
run dry during summer months, the Israeli water company, Mekorot, which has a
monopoly on the water in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, simply shuts off
the valves that supply Palestinian towns. This means settlers get their swimming
pools topped up while Palestinian villages a few miles away run out of drinking
water.
In a typical Israeli reaction to the news of
the use of the Abu Shusha dump, the army’s ‘civil administration’ (the military
occupation authority) announced that it has now temporarily halted construction
after it was discovered that the bottom of the garbage pit was not properly
insulated. Garbage already dumped, hundreds of tons of it, would now be removed
before nylon sheeting is installed to line the floor of the dump, the army said.
But what if the nylon is eventually ripped by the sheer weight of the trash?
What if toxic waste spills out over the sides of the floor? What if there is an
earthquake? The ‘civil’ administration now also says that the dump will take
Palestinian, as well as Israeli, waste. But Yossi Sarid, the left-wing Israeli
parliamentarian and former environment minister, told the Israeli daily Ha’aretz
that the dump is a “double crime,” since “Israel is preventing the Palestinians
from making use of the quarry and its resources and in exchange we are giving
them Sharon’s garbage.”
What the ‘civil’ administration is actually
trying to do is damage control, mainly by means of media spin. The calculation
seems to be that if Israel can get its hands on some Palestinian garbage now and
redirect it to Abu Shusha, then the use of the Occupied Palestinian Territories
will suddenly seem to benefit the local population, and Israel will no longer be
breaking international law in Abu Shusha.
But this is not the time to be separating
trash from trash according to national origin. All Israeli garbage dumped on
Palestinian territory is illegal. This is the time to go one step further than
the former Israeli environment minister’s condemnation of the practice and to
stop the crimes of Israel, whether single, double, or multiple. By the way, some
of the garbage will come from the nearby illegal Israeli settlement of Kedumim.
Maybe this is all the army means by “Palestinian” waste.
There are no settlements near the dump site;
however, there are four Palestinian villages and thousands of Palestinian olive
and almond trees within two miles of the dump. They will be the ones to suffer
first and foremost from pollution emanating from the dump. And the inhabitants
of those villages or the owners of those olive and almond groves were never
asked for permission or advice, neither by the army, nor by the Israeli private
firms that operate the dump. Those firms say that the choice of Abu Shusha is a
way to raise profits and cut costs by a quarter, compared to the use of garbage
dumps on Israeli territory. But what are those cut costs? Do they – by any
remote chance – include environmental protection measures?
The companies participating in the project
include D.S.H., a Netanya-based garbage disposal company owned by the Valensi
family, and Baron Industrial Park, a company owned jointly by town councils in
Israel and the illegal settlement of Kedumim’s town council. Ha’aretz reported
that the initial use of the dump, which started six months ago, was illegal
because Israel has not yet issued a tender, as required by State law.
Furthermore, an approval by the Israeli Environment Ministry is also missing.
MIFTAH condemns all breaches of international
law, whoever the perpetrator may be. An investigation by Israeli authorities,
specifically civil, is also called for, since Israeli law also appears to have
been violated on a number of issues. The basic problem behind this latest
scandal, not the first scandal involving Israeli waste disposal in Palestine, is
the illegal military occupation of Palestine by Israel.